rblnr Posted April 12, 2023 Share Posted April 12, 2023 According to the instructions, the SYNC setting is for when your clock is hooked to more than one device on in your system. BTW, if anyone is going to Axpona, stop by the Scaena room (Epiphany) and say hi. Ask for Bob :) Industry participation disclosure: dealer for Paradigm, Anthem, Audiovector, Scaena, Hegel, NAD, Bluesound, Parasound, Teac, Roon Labs, Artnovion acoustic treatment, Storm Audio (best AV prepro on Earth!), JVC, Clarus Cable and Power, more.. www.outreachav.com 2 channel system: EERA Majestuoso II DAC, Teac UD-701N DAC/Streamer, Teac CG-M10 Clock, Technics 1200GLE TT, Dynavector XX2mkII cartridge, Hegel phono stage, Hegel P30A preamp, Hegel H30A amp, Scaena 3.2 loudspeakers, Clarus Crimson cabling/Duet power conditioner, PS Audio P20 power regenerator, Roon Nucleus+ server. Surround: above plus Storm Audio ISP MK2 prepro, Paradigm Persona subs (2), Paradigm XR13 sub, NAD M28 amp (2) Link to comment
bodiebill Posted April 12, 2023 Share Posted April 12, 2023 3 minutes ago, rblnr said: According to the instructions, the SYNC setting is for when your clock is hooked to more than one device on in your system. BTW, if anyone is going to Axpona, stop by the Scaena room (Epiphany) and say hi. Ask for Bob :) Yes, that is clear from the manual. But what does the SYNC setting actually do? What does it process clock-wise other than the reference clock pulse? I would probably not ask if the SYNC setting would sound better in my case (with multiple clocked devices) as expected, but it does not. audio system Link to comment
semente Posted April 16, 2023 Share Posted April 16, 2023 On 4/12/2023 at 3:47 PM, bodiebill said: Yes, that is clear from the manual. But what does the SYNC setting actually do? What does it process clock-wise other than the reference clock pulse? I would probably not ask if the SYNC setting would sound better in my case (with multiple clocked devices) as expected, but it does not. Have you tried removing the Mutec from the chain? It sounds like you might not need it. ON (DIN ASYNC) This unit’s master clock will be synchronized to the 10MHz clock input through the CLOCK sync input (10MHz IN) connector. • When the input source is COAXIAL, OPTICAL or Bluetooth, select this when only this unit is synchronized with external clock. ON (DIN SYNC) This unit’s master clock will be synchronized to the 10MHz clock input through the CLOCK sync input (10MHz IN) connector. • When the input source is COAXIAL, OPTICAL or Bluetooth, select this when both this unit and the digital audio output device are synchronized with the same external clock. NOTE NOTE When the input source is USB or NET (including USB flash drives), operation will be the same when set to either ON (DIN ASYNC) or ON (DIN SYNC). "Science draws the wave, poetry fills it with water" Teixeira de Pascoaes HQ Player Desktop/ Mac mini → HQ Player NAA/ CuBox-i → Intona 7054 → RME ADI-2 DAC FS Link to comment
bodiebill Posted April 16, 2023 Share Posted April 16, 2023 1 hour ago, semente said: Have you tried removing the Mutec from the chain? It sounds like you might not need it. ON (DIN ASYNC) This unit’s master clock will be synchronized to the 10MHz clock input through the CLOCK sync input (10MHz IN) connector. • When the input source is COAXIAL, OPTICAL or Bluetooth, select this when only this unit is synchronized with external clock. ON (DIN SYNC) This unit’s master clock will be synchronized to the 10MHz clock input through the CLOCK sync input (10MHz IN) connector. • When the input source is COAXIAL, OPTICAL or Bluetooth, select this when both this unit and the digital audio output device are synchronized with the same external clock. NOTE NOTE When the input source is USB or NET (including USB flash drives), operation will be the same when set to either ON (DIN ASYNC) or ON (DIN SYNC). If I would remove the Mutec (Ref10 SE120), these Q&A's would be moot as there would not be an exterrnal clock, and OFF on the Teac would be the only working setting. I agree that I do not 'need' the Mutec, but the resulting sound without it is considerably less pleasing. Current setup: stand alone USB player > USB > Audio-GD DI20HE DDC > spdif RCA > UD-701N Both the DDC and the DAC are timed by the Mutec. audio system Link to comment
semente Posted April 16, 2023 Share Posted April 16, 2023 39 minutes ago, bodiebill said: If I would remove the Mutec (Ref10 SE120), these Q&A's would be moot as there would not be an exterrnal clock, and OFF on the Teac would be the only working setting. I agree that I do not 'need' the Mutec, but the resulting sound without it is considerably less pleasing. Current setup: stand alone USB player > USB > Audio-GD DI20HE DDC > spdif RCA > UD-701N Both the DDC and the DAC are timed by the Mutec. My question was whether it sounds better without the Mutec and ASYNC. What about USB vs. your S/PDIF setup? "Science draws the wave, poetry fills it with water" Teixeira de Pascoaes HQ Player Desktop/ Mac mini → HQ Player NAA/ CuBox-i → Intona 7054 → RME ADI-2 DAC FS Link to comment
Popular Post bodiebill Posted April 16, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted April 16, 2023 50 minutes ago, semente said: My question was whether it sounds better without the Mutec and ASYNC. What about USB vs. your S/PDIF setup? Comparison of: (1) USB --> Audio-GD DI20HE DDC --> spdif RCA --> UD-701N with ASYNC setting (2) USB --> Audio-GD DI20HE DDC --> spdif RCA --> UD-701N with SYNC setting (3) USB --> UD-701N with ASYNC setting with the Mutec as external clock. In terms of SQ: (1) > (2) >> (3) Jakenz and semente 2 audio system Link to comment
bodiebill Posted April 27, 2023 Share Posted April 27, 2023 Today I downloaded new system firmware for the UD-701N: https://teac.jp/int/support/news/7140 However, following Teac's instructions for system firmware update https://manuals.plus/teac/ud-701n-music-player-manual#axzz804g86GbQ?utm_content=cmp-true I cannot get it to install. I first installed the DFU driver and went through the steps, but when I start the UD-701N_updater_136.exe file I get the message below. I tried 5 different micro usb cables. Any idea? audio system Link to comment
celestial_sound Posted April 27, 2023 Author Share Posted April 27, 2023 I ran into the same issue, but changing the cable resolved the problem. Make sure that the cable supports data transfer (typical phone charger cables wont work). Link to comment
bodiebill Posted April 27, 2023 Share Posted April 27, 2023 49 minutes ago, celestial_sound said: I ran into the same issue, but changing the cable resolved the problem. Make sure that the cable supports data transfer (typical phone charger cables wont work). Thanks! And indeed, cable number 6 did work. Upgraded now to 1.36 :-) audio system Link to comment
celestial_sound Posted April 27, 2023 Author Share Posted April 27, 2023 Glad to hear! Keep enjoying :) Link to comment
Popular Post bodiebill Posted May 1, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted May 1, 2023 Today I again played with the the UD-701N directly from a usb drive. This can be done with the NET mode for remote control, although the files are fed locally rather than via the network. I much prefer the sound this way compared to the DAC's internal streamer. Question: is there any way to access the contents of such a usb drive -- while attached to the DAC -- from a PC or otherwise? P S 1 I ordered an Afterdark Rosanna Network Bridge for use as a Diretta target, so will see whether this will bring the streaming SQ up to par with that from the usb drive. P S 2 I now seem to prefer multibit above 1 bit. It sounds a bit fuller/rounder/richer. Aspirant Audiophile and Jakenz 1 1 audio system Link to comment
bodiebill Posted May 1, 2023 Share Posted May 1, 2023 1 hour ago, bodiebill said: Question: is there any way to access the contents of such a usb drive -- while attached to the DAC -- from a PC or otherwise? Question answered in the meantime: yes. But alas no editing (adding/removing files) seems possible. audio system Link to comment
celestial_sound Posted May 11, 2023 Author Share Posted May 11, 2023 Finally someone did a lab test on the UD-701N (https://reviewary.com/teac-ud-701n-review/). Unfortunately, this unit doesn't measure extremely well like some chines competitors do, but that doesn't change the fact that it sounds magnificent! Link to comment
Norton Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 31 minutes ago, celestial_sound said: Finally someone did a lab test on the UD-701N (https://reviewary.com/teac-ud-701n-review/). Unfortunately, this unit doesn't measure extremely well like some chines competitors do, but that doesn't change the fact that it sounds magnificent! Thanks for posting this. I know it’s subjective opinion, but even from such a well established reviewer it seems a rather unusual position to find that “ESS offer listeners silky smooth sound….Think of ESS as a warm cosy bedroom”. I know implementation is all, but from experience, I’d describe ESS based DACs as tending towards a superdetailed, lean sound and with potential to sound hard, flat and fatiguing without careful implementation. With my admittedly limited knowledge I’m also a bit confused from this review as to the UD701 tech - I thought it was a 1bit delta-sigma DAC but based on it’s own discrete solution rather than off the shelf chips, but the review describes it as multi-bit. Can a DAC be described as being both delta sigma and multibit? Maybe 2 different paths involved as per T&A etc? semente 1 Link to comment
celestial_sound Posted May 11, 2023 Author Share Posted May 11, 2023 I'm not entirely sure whether TEAC uses separate path for DSD and PCM albeit they support native DSD. This is from their website "DSD signals are transmitted as is, while PCM signals are transmitted after passing through a ΔΣ modulator and conversion to 1-bit signals." Link to comment
Miska Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 2 hours ago, celestial_sound said: I'm not entirely sure whether TEAC uses separate path for DSD and PCM albeit they support native DSD. This is from their website "DSD signals are transmitted as is, while PCM signals are transmitted after passing through a ΔΣ modulator and conversion to 1-bit signals." It is always a DSD-DAC. So there is only one D/A conversion path and that is DSD. DSD goes straight through there, while PCM inputs are first converted to DSD internally before passing to the D/A section. semente 1 Signalyst - Developer of HQPlayer Pulse & Fidelity - Software Defined Amplifiers Link to comment
celestial_sound Posted May 11, 2023 Author Share Posted May 11, 2023 39 minutes ago, Miska said: It is always a DSD-DAC. So there is only one D/A conversion path and that is DSD. DSD goes straight through there, while PCM inputs are first converted to DSD internally before passing to the D/A section. Yep you are right. This is manufacturer response on my email enquiry. "Our delta sigma modulator is the multi-level delta sigma modulator, that outputs in 9 levels/values, from 0 to 8. The basic delta sigma modulator normally outputs in 1-bit, but we modified to output in multi-level for the tolerance to clock-jitter or solution for resonance. For example, in the 48kHz system of audio signal, it outputs 9 values 6.144MHz/12.288MHz/24.576MHz for x128, x256 and x512 settings" Link to comment
celestial_sound Posted May 11, 2023 Author Share Posted May 11, 2023 @Miska One more question. If fhe source signal is DSD, and the multibit pcm setting is active on the UD 701, does that mean the signal will be converted? Or DSD signals are always unchanged and outputted as 1 bit stream Link to comment
celestial_sound Posted May 12, 2023 Author Share Posted May 12, 2023 @Miska Sorry, I think I wasn't clear enough with my previous question. Let me rephrase Does playing DSD source like HQPlayer bypasses both the internal oversampling and delta sigma modulator of the UD-701N?, Link to comment
Popular Post Miska Posted May 12, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted May 12, 2023 9 hours ago, celestial_sound said: @Miska One more question. If fhe source signal is DSD, and the multibit pcm setting is active on the UD 701, does that mean the signal will be converted? Or DSD signals are always unchanged and outputted as 1 bit stream Sorry, I don't know about the setting details. 1 hour ago, celestial_sound said: Does playing DSD source like HQPlayer bypasses both the internal oversampling and delta sigma modulator of the UD-701N? According to the manufacturer's documentation it does. semente and Jakenz 2 Signalyst - Developer of HQPlayer Pulse & Fidelity - Software Defined Amplifiers Link to comment
celestial_sound Posted May 15, 2023 Author Share Posted May 15, 2023 Another review of UD 701N with a direct comparison to Esoteric N05-XD https://www-audionet-com-tw.translate.goog/thread-15974-1-1.html?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp alecm 1 Link to comment
Jakenz Posted May 23, 2023 Share Posted May 23, 2023 On 4/7/2023 at 12:50 AM, bodiebill said: Yesterday I received my UD-701N and I love it already. It was a "second deal" and indeed, it seems already broken in. Sound was great from the start: detailed, 3D, fluid, velvety and wonderful bass. I am still a bit confused regarding the Teac's upconvert / Fs process, as shown by my following question: My settings are - upconvert: x8 - DeltaSigma Fs: 256 Fs (or 512 Fs) - PCM Delta Sigma: DSD (1 Bit) - DSD Low Pass Filter: FIR1 When playing a 44.1 kHz wav file I would expect that the Teac's INFO button would show PCM 44.1kHz => DSD 11.2MHz as per the example in the manual. However it shows PCM 44.1kHz => PCM 352.8Hz Am I missing something? That's a very positive first impression, especially given your baseline of the A26 & R8. Appreciate from your subsequent posts (incl re use of the DI-20HE) it sounds like you're still in the process of finding optimal settings etc, but I'd be interested in your thoughts as to where it sits relative to those DACs, which I realise are themselves very different and in a different price class. This was on my radar when I got the R26 last year, but had next to no reviews or user experience back then, so great to seeit is getting some increasing exposure, positive user impressions. Link to comment
Popular Post bodiebill Posted May 23, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted May 23, 2023 7 hours ago, Jakenz said: That's a very positive first impression, especially given your baseline of the A26 & R8. Appreciate from your subsequent posts (incl re use of the DI-20HE) it sounds like you're still in the process of finding optimal settings etc, but I'd be interested in your thoughts as to where it sits relative to those DACs, which I realise are themselves very different and in a different price class. This was on my radar when I got the R26 last year, but had next to no reviews or user experience back then, so great to see it is getting some increasing exposure, positive user impressions. And after another month or so, I remain impressed by the Teac UD-701N. I recommended it to a friend of mine for his 'second set'. He currently has a MU1 with a Mola Mola Makua preamp with Tambaqui DAC board. He is so enamoured by the Teac, especially when playing files from a usb stick, that he is currently also using it in his first set. I am still experimenting with configurations, with (PCM176/192 max) or without (DSD256 max) the DI20HE. Different software (Audirvana Studio and HQPlayer from mac M1 or Windows PC, APlayer, aprenderer, HQPe, gmediarender on a GentooPlayer NUC) etc. All using the Diretta protocol into an Afterdark Rosanna Diretta Network Bridge. I do prefer this to the Teac's internal streamer. I agree that using the Teac to play from a usb stick (preferably a good SSD or M.2) is really really good! The gap with streaming is becoming narrower though. With long listening the A26 gave me some fatigue. No such thing with the Teac. However, I do have the impression that above 2k DACs are quite quickly converging in SQ, and we are more and more talking about character differences. In addition to the Teac I have an Audio-GD R8HE Mk2 DAC that I really also love. It enables me to do DSD512 with the DI20He. Quite a luxury (and sometimes burden) to have so many choices. Aspirant Audiophile, Vincent des Champs and Jakenz 3 audio system Link to comment
celestial_sound Posted May 23, 2023 Author Share Posted May 23, 2023 Sorry for jumping in you discussion @Jakenz, @bodiebill I just want to share my impression on the configs. My personal choice is multi-bit PCM with 512x fs and on some occasions 8x up-conversation. This config I feel gives me best low frequency definition, widest soundstage, best clarity and air around the instruments. Switching to 1 bit DSD FIR-1 gives a bit of roundness and smoothness which is also really nice but in my opinion it sacrifices clarity, air and definition. Switching the up-conversion algorithm on (8x fs) gives me shimmering and sparkle to the cymbals which i really like but I feel it trades a bit timbral accuracy. Jakenz 1 Link to comment
Popular Post celestial_sound Posted May 23, 2023 Author Popular Post Share Posted May 23, 2023 Just to add to my previous post. The beautiful thing is that you can tweak your settings and configure the sound you like ti most, and it will mostly depend on your speakers and amplifier as well. For example, my current speakers are Sonus faber and the amplification is Pass Labs, both components are known for their relaxed presentation and slightly warmer sound. And that is probably why appreciate clarity air and definition from the DAC, they combine different attributes which leads to more complete sound. Someone with more analytical setup having speakers like Magico's / Børresen etc will probably appreciate 1 bit DSD more . Jakenz and bodiebill 2 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now